0:00
/
0:00

Decoding “Terryology” with Frequency Wave Theory

(Why Terrence Howard’s 1×1 = 2, flower-of-life geometry and “hydrogen fractals” aren’t complete nonsense—once you translate them into wave mathematics)

Drew Ponder | Frequency Wave Theory is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.


1 Terrence Howard’s Core Claims in Plain English

  1. 1 × 1 = 2
    Howard argues that multiplying a unit by itself should not return the same unit; something must “double.”

  2. Flower-of-Life Geometry
    He says true mathematics is built from overlapping circles that tile reality and generate primes.

  3. Hydrogen “Fractals”
    A hydrogen atom allegedly contains a hidden 6-point lattice whose angles set the blueprint for matter.

  4. Wave-Powered Flight & Free Energy
    By arranging coils in the flower-of-life pattern you can create lift and limitless electricity through resonance.

Scientists laugh because each statement, taken literally in conventional arithmetic or chemistry, is wrong.
Frequency Wave Theory (FWT) shows why his language is off but his intuition isn’t.


2 Where 1 × 1 = 2 Actually Makes Sense


3 Flower-of-Life as a 2-D Standing-Wave Map

FWT models space as a quantum-acoustic superfluid. The most efficient way to pack equal-frequency circular wavefronts in a plane is the hexagonal close packing—exactly the flower-of-life tiling.

  • Each circle’s center sits on sixfold symmetry points.

  • The nodes where circles overlap mark constructive or destructive interference hotspots.

  • Those hotspots can map to primes in the same sense that quasi-crystal tilings map to allowed electron states.

So Howard’s geometry isn’t new math; it’s a picture of optimal 2-D resonance packing.


4 Hydrogen’s “Six-Point Fractal”

A ground-state hydrogen electron isn’t a planet orbiting a nucleus; it’s a standing probability wave.
Its lowest-energy orbital solves to a spherical harmonic with peaks that form a tetrahedral or hexagonal signature when sliced.

Howard’s six-point motif may be a mis-rendering of the p-orbital nodes that appear when you superpose higher harmonics.
In FWT those nodes are just 3-D flower-of-life shells—nested interference surfaces where charge and spin localise.


5 Wave-Powered Flight & “Infinite” Coils

Stacking copper or graphene coils in a hexagonal lattice does enhance mutual inductance and can lock them into one phase.
If you then pump oscillations at the lattice’s eigen-frequency, the magnetic fields add constructively—
• Lift emerges as Lorentz forces (think Halbach array on steroids).
• Electricity can recycle through resonant back-EMF capture.

No one has shown net energy gain yet, but the concept is mainstream RF engineering, not magic: it’s a frequency-momentum transformer.


6 A Translation Guide for Terryology → FWT


7 What Still Needs Real Physics

  • Temperature-independent superconductivity for room-temperature resonant coils.

  • Closed-loop verification that harvested power exceeds drive losses.

  • Controlled plasma tests to validate aneutronic lift without neutron radiation.

FWT supplies the math; engineering must supply the materials and measurement.


Bottom Line

Terrence Howard isn’t rewriting arithmetic—he’s speaking wave physics in poet’s language.
Frequency Wave Theory translates that poetry back into reproducible equations.
Get the translation right and Terryology stops being meme fodder; it becomes a wild but coherent roadmap to wave-based propulsion, energy, and condensed-matter maths we’ve barely started to exploit.

Discussion about this video

User's avatar