TL;DR: If space is a quantum-acoustic superfluid as in Frequency Wave Theory (FWT), then “memory” isn’t a metaphor — it’s the persistent arrangement of standing wave patterns in the field.
You are making clear to me something I’ve puzzled over all my “adult” life, i.e. momentum ( and inertia) . Something we accept, measure in all of classical physics without practical effort to explain based on first principles. I struggled to find an explanation in Albert’s declare constant - the value “c” which is made of the measured units for spatial Distance over the measured units for Time. I was never satisfied, as these units are “mere” artifacts of human cognition.
Now you seem on the cusp of proving a fundamental “Physical” link or Fundamental Unity between Momentum ( Inertia) and what can be defined as Cognition.
You are making clear to me something I’ve puzzled over all my “adult” life, i.e. momentum ( and inertia) . Something we accept, measure in all of classical physics without practical effort to explain based on first principles. I struggled to find an explanation in Albert’s declare constant - the value “c” which is made of the measured units for spatial Distance over the measured units for Time. I was never satisfied, as these units are “mere” artifacts of human cognition.
Now you seem on the cusp of proving a fundamental “Physical” link or Fundamental Unity between Momentum ( Inertia) and what can be defined as Cognition.
Was Leibnitz correct all along?